Today I am thankful that spring is making inroads (although it will be cold tomorrow). I am also thankful that I figured out what was wrong with my outfit today, so I won’t make the same mistake again (a big sparkly girly necklace with a detailed cardigan was too girly for me.)
Last week in a comment on a post of Belette’s, I said that I was didn’t trust passion, so I had to find other names for it to make it okay. She asked to hear more, so here I go. I wonder what I’ll find out.
I don’t trust passion. I don’t trust it because it is flamboyantly, definitionally out of the ordinary. It’s a solar flare, a shooting star. I don’t trust it because I don’t see how it connects to the hard, sometimes boring, usually relentless work of getting things done, making change in the world, taking an idea and doing something with it that makes a difference.
A moment’s thought reveals that this is a silly dichotomy. I imagine that people who have strong passions are in fact motivated by those passions to get up every day and roll a big heavy rock a little bit farther up a steep forbidding hill. People use passion in fact to fuel hard and relentless work. My problem is that I get so caught up in the work that I lose the thread of passion. The work becomes its own process, its own motivation. Getting things done drives out the reason for doing. Passion looks like what motivates other people to make work for me (in a good and bad sense — I have a job because my boss has a passion for what we do).
If you were to ask me what my passions are, I wouldn’t know how to answer. I can tell you about my interests. But I don’t think anything I undertake rises to the level of passion. Wouldn’t I have to be better at something if it were my passion? Wouldn’t I know more about it? Wouldn’t I be an expert, spending hours and hours to the exclusion of all else on it? I don’t feel like I can claim anything like that. I can tell you that I love things, but I will be very scared that you will show me how much you know about them that I don’t myself. And then I will think, “Oh, I guess I don’t love it as much as I thought,” as if your superior knowledge crowds out my emotions (superior knowledge trumps everything as far as I’m concerned, actually).
When I see someone who is passionate, I am likely to respond to his or her energy, but what really really gets me charged up is seeing someone who is really, really good at the task at hand. I’d rather see that than passion. Passion seems almost performative — “Look at me! I’m up here all aflame with my passion! Whoo-ee — I’m burning up the stage.” Being really good at what you do means focusing entirely on the doing of it. If it’s related to another person, then the focus is on that other person, but not necessarily on an audience. It’s arete. That’s what strikes a chord in me. I don’t need a life of passion. I crave a life of arete, and I am so very far from it. But that distance doesn’t depress me (at least at the moment). I am just thrilled that such a thing as arete exists, and that I can be exposed to it from time to time. It’s glorious.
Notice that it’s taken me 600 words in to a post on passion to mention Daniel. We have passion, and we have hard and relentless work. Marriage, or at least my marriage, is where passion and quotidian struggles are irreconcilable. And quotidian struggles usually win. If I could put a tired and wry half smile into words, I would do that now.